National Center for Missing and Exploited Children

Law enforcement has mobilized against child pornography(CP) possession, with very little real scientific data tracking the extent of CP possession cases, or in describing CP characteristics in the criminal justice system.  Legal definitions of both what a child is, and what pornography is, differ considerably among jurisdictions in the USA and the world as a whole. Therefore the purpose of  research of those who poses CP is often DEFINED BROADLY as any record of sexual activity involving a prepubescent person but that is hardly the case. I’m not saying it doesn’t exist; it does as in the, “Wonderland club”; However that isn’t the norm. The majority are pornographic records include still photographs, videos, and audio recordings people download off P2P file sharing programs with an inadvertent down loaded 30 to 50yo CP images that can only be coming from only one place.  That place being the government because they are the ones through National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) they have been collecting them for decades. 

FBI and Pentagon officials have been purchasing it and spreading it around for years( FBI & Pentagon officials purchased and downloaded child porn – 5,200 employees caught).  Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has for years been involved in stuffing child pornography images and moving-images inside of average files shared by servers sanctioned by the FBI. The methods of stuffing varies from each agent or officer but are approved as long as the suspect cannot detect that the file contains child pornography until the file has been downloaded. Child pornography has successfully been stuffed into adult pornography films, music files using ID3 tags, software programs, keygens and cracks, and other material that has been illicitly traded over P2P. (

A picture of a 17yo is considered child porn; think about it!  Were not talking about sick photos of babies and pre pubescent children because people  Ass U me.  only NCMEC has all those images. 

NCMEC has distort facts and plain old LIEd; they state, “850,000 children (or about 2,329 every day) are reported missing every year in the United States. According to their 2007 Annual Report which can be viewed here( They also state that in the 24 years that they have been in business they have assisted in the recovery of 121,000 children. Let’s use basic math 850,000 children “missing” every year; 2,329 children missing every day? In the 24 years NCMEC been around their figures amount to, 19.2 MILLION missing children. NCMEC should be applauded for the recovery of 121,000 children but, when compared to over 19 million quoted as missing, their recovery rate appears alarmingly low. Let’s put these numbers into perspective by taking the current population of the entire state of New York being 19.4 million and if we are to believe NCMEC’s claims about the number of missing children that would be tantamount to the entire population of the state of New York missing, gone, vanished! If we compare these numbers to the Vietnam War where a total of approximately 2.6 Million U.S. troops were sent to serve in Vietnam where most everyone either knows a Vietnam veteran or knows someone who knows a Vietnam veteran but can the same be said for a missing child? Given these numbers and the analogies above, how many people actually have a missing child or know someone that does?

The majority of missing children are runaways and or noncustodial parental abductions. Strange abductions account for less than 1% of the cases! You would never know that in listening to NCMEC rhetoric in their quest for TAX DOLLARS to live their lavish life styles. 

Ernie Allen former director of NCMEC is the master of the Big Lie. NCMEC even provides resources for assistance to entrepreneurs seeking to follow Ernie Allen’s footsteps and get into the “non-profit” child-saving business and there are no reference on their web site to the “causes” of parental abduction or runaway/thrownaway teens or any other social problem. The National Children’s Advocacy Center, founded in 1985 by Alabama Democrat congressman Bud Cramer and in the wake of the founding of NCMEC he funneled federal money directly into NCMEC sex-panic promotion that continues till this day. In addition to government funding, all of these organizations have private funding and strong support from corporate sponsors, individual donors and volunteers. While government agencies, and especially the Reagan administration, played key roles in the founding and the continued subsidizing of the sex-panic industry, private entrepreneurs have been involved from the start, and many businesses happily sponsor these organizations and their witch-hunts. The Reagan administration advisers working with Ernie Allen took care to make sure the NCMEC was set up as a “public private partnership” – thereby insulating it to some degree from the traditional political bickering over the merits of public versus private involvement in social issues. The degree to which the NCMEC is devoted to stoking the flames of the sex panic has had a pervasive effect on how they handle all the other tasks they set for themselves and this is especially true in the case of runaway/throwaway teens, for whom the agency is essentially useless; unless somebody’s penis pops out of their pants. It is also true in the case of parental abductions, and unlike runaway/throwaway cases, cases revolving around custody disputes often involve adults with the time, resources and inclination to make a public stink. Some of these folks have organized and taken their grievances public. Here are a couple of their web sites where it is apparent that the NCMEC and Ernie Allen have pissed some people off.(

Law enforcement says that children shown in the photographs are abused in the making of pornography, and pornographic films or photographs are a record of their abuse; However a British Columbia justice, Judge Shaw writes that “only assumptions” support the idea that child pornography incites people to have sex with children and that it’s debatable whether the laws against possessing child pornography protect children and, given that fact, do not justify invading someone’s privacy. 

The judge states, “Books, diaries, pictures, clothes, and other belongings are personal and private expressions of their owner’s beliefs, opinions, thoughts and conscience”, he wrote. “The simple possession prohibition deals with a very intimate and private aspect of a person’s life and, in my view, that fact should be given considerable weight. I find that the limited effectiveness of the prohibition is insufficient to warrant its highly invasive effects.”. 

From New York to Chicago, and recently in Denver the U.S. Sentencing Commission heard federal judges testify the current sentencing structure for possessing and viewing child pornography is too severe. U.S. District Judge John L. Kane, who is presiding over child porn case, has granted three defendants in similar cases probation rather than incarceration, drawing the ire of prosecutors.  Ernie Allen, president and chief executive of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, said some judges don’t realize possessing the images revictimizes the children in the photographs and fuels a growing online business; However there is little evidence to support this conclusion by an unelected official. Allen also said. “These are images of prepubescent children, growing numbers of them infants and toddlers, and they trade with each other for purposes of arousal and breaking down the inhibitions of other children.”. What he doesnt tell you is these images are in the posession of NCMEC. People search come upon a file and then download these images from NCMEC then they send in the police or provide the police with their software all set up to do the same.  Law enforcement always say, ” images of prepubescent children, growing numbers of them infants and toddlers” even when non exist so to incite the moral indignation of the public in order to keep the insanity going.  Law enforcement also combine images in listeners ears by saying, “Study after study links child sexual abuse to psychological trauma, addiction and violent relationships in adulthood and beyond child pornography, parts of the Internet have become virtual brothels where children are bought and sold for sex every day ” ; However According to a 2009 U.S. Department of Justice report, there were 1,229 suspected human trafficking incidents in the United States from January 2007- September 2008. Of these, 83 percent were sex trafficking cases, though only 9% of all cases could be confirmed as examples of human trafficking.

In 1742, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, wrote, ‘There is no crueler tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice’. Two hundred and forty-three years later, in 1985, Dorothy Rabinowitz, a syndicated columnist and television commentator, encountered the case of a New Jersey day care worker named Kelly Michaels, accused of 280 counts of sexually abusing nursery school children and exposed the first of the proprietorial abuses described in No Crueler Tyrannies. The book recalls the hysteria that accompanied the child sex-abuse witch-hunts of the 1980s and 1990s and how a single anonymous phone call could bring to bear an army of recovered-memory therapists, venal and ambitious prosecutors, and hypocritical judges that jailed hundreds of innocent Americans. “No Crueler Tyrannies is at once a truly frightening and at the same time inspiring book, documenting how these citizens, who became targets of the justice system in which they had so much faith, came to comprehend that their lives could be destroyed, that they could be sent to prison for years – even decades. It shows the complicity of the courts, their hypocrisy and indifference to the claims of justice, but also the courage of those willing to challenge the runaway prosecutors and the strength of those who have endured their depredations.”. The witch hunt continues to this day orchestrated by NCMEC and their pseudo scientists along with the prosecutors and judges that believe them. 

Another report law enforcement like to reference is, “ THE EFFECTS ON JUVENILES OF BEING USED FOR PROSTITUTION AND POPNOGRAPHY” by Himi Halper Silbert 1989 for NCMEC. This report is based on self reports from young men and women, boys and girls who have been involved in juvenile prostitution and/or pornography and results from two sources a two and one half year exploratory study of “The Sexual Assault of Prostitutes’,conducted for the National Center for the Prevention and Control of Rape, National Institute of Mental Health, sponsored through the Delancey Street.  Foundation in which the author was the principal investigator; and Three volumes describe the results of the study, Grant #ROl MH 32762-01, in detail. Silbert, Mimi, Sexual Assault of Prostitutes, Volume I: Phase One Final Report: Volume II: Phase ‘Ike Final Report: Volume III: Summary Report. National Center for the Prevention and Control of Rape, NIMH, 1982. The report states clinical experiences with well over a thousand prostitutes and a hundred people who were used to make pornography as juveniles. So out of the hundred people used for pornography came the RE victimization model of which out of the hundred Two-thirds of the victims were sexually assaulted by father figures: Thirty-three percent were abused by their natural father; thirty percent by a step or foster father; four percent by a mother’s common law husband. Only ten percent were sexually molested by strangers. Several victims report that the abuser showed them pictures depicting children involved in sexual acts with adults to convince them them it was OK. Thirty-eight percent of the 200 women prostitutes interviewed reported that sexually explicit photographs had been taken of them when they were children for commercial purposes, and/or the personal gratification of the photographer; Thats 76 individuals. Years Later according to the article stated long term impact of participating in pornography appears to be even more debilitating than the immediate effects.  The initial negative responses of shame, fear, or anxiety develop into extremely negative self-concepts. according to Silbert suggest here that when excessive victimization is coupled with the lack of understanding of the causes of the abuse, as well as a sense of impotence to do anything to change the situation, then a sense of psychological paralysis develops; However that can be a result from many things in life. Silbert sums it up by stating,”While not all appear to be seriously traumatized at the time that they are involved, the long term effects seem to be extremely damaging for so many, particularly when compounded by other abuses and/or secondary problems.”.( Real arguments are often embedded within a very long discussion. Richard Whately, one of the greatest of the 19th century researchers into informal logic, wisely said, “A very long discussion is one of the most effective veils of Fallacy; …a Fallacy, which when stated barely…would not deceive a child, may deceive half the world if diluted in a quarto volume.”. This is particularly true of the child porn witch hunt and the circular, either/or, and ad populum logical fallacies attached to it so if your against on line surveillance you must be for child porn. Think of the children can be used to justify why something should, or should not, be done. When used as a plea for pity, this appeal to emotion can constitute a potential logical fallacy, while when used as an appeal for sympathy for weaker members of society, or the social good of the long-term health and viability of a society, it can constitute an argument for social justice generally accepted as appropriate. Claiming to do something for the benefit of children is not a fallacy of itself, but if used to avoid logical debate, it is a thought terminating cliche. (The child abuse industry has had decades to formulate their strategy to keep tax dollars and donations going.)  “what about the children” is an illogical appeal to emotion and it is used to avoid logical debate. Silberts work was full of logical fallacies to the extent if one child said something they all said it, the long term effects seem to be extremely damaging and long term impact of participating in pornography appears to be even more debilitating than the immediate effects. Where is the research? A careful review of the scientific literature fails to provide support for the way that these concepts are used (Wakefield & Underwager, in press). There is no support for the assumption that it is common for children to undergo repeated, traumatic sexual abuse but, as adults, have no conscious memories of the abuse until it is uncovered by a therapist “skilled” in such matters.

Prosecutors also say there is documented links between individuals who view child pornography and individuals who actually molest children and refer to “Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis” by Kenneth V. Lanning Former Supervisory Special Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)for NCMEC states he has devoted more than seven years part-time, and eleven years full-time, of my professional life to researching, training, and consulting in the area of the sexual victimization of children. I guess so, if I were on the governments dime I would dedicate my professional life to researching, training, and consulting as well. Mr. Lanning states he has a B.B.A and a M.S. I was unable to find any reference for either; one would think his attributes would be listed on Wikipedia or another source I was unable to find any. Digging deep I was able to find work Lanning did produced, a monograph in 1994 on Satanic Ritual Abuse SRA aimed at child protection authorities, which contained his opinion that despite hundreds of investigations no corroboration of SRA had been found. Following this report, several convictions based on SRA allegations were overturned and the defendants released; However many many innocent people went to jail over logical fallacies.

How Can We Avoid Believing Things That Aren’t True? David Finkelhor one of the most frequently cited research authorities due to his own advocacy in what has become known as child sexual abuse, his work has been criticised by other authors such as Bruce Rind, for its poor sampling and use of morality to make broad sweeping statements about adult-child sex. His publish or perish mentality created 12 books and well over 200 journal articles. Finkelhor has addressed US Congress with a group of researchers. He agreed with the group that standard advice given to children not to divulge personal details was flawed and that adult-minor sexual contacts solicited over the web rarely conform to the pathological model, and are chosen by teens themselves.  His advice has not been adopted by professionals. Finkelhor also worked on the study of sexual abuse in day cares in an attempt to legitimize the satanic ritual abuse panic, including the discredited McMartin preschool case. Critics have pointed to numerous flaws in Finkelhor’s research papers such as his exclusion of data because, none exist, wrong conclusions, moral indignation, uses research  not representative of the general population. Other NCMEC researchers have failed to meet other material legal requirements governing research,and have falsified data.  It is very difficult to find anything negative about NCMEC on the internet.  Just type into any search engine anything that has to do with NCMEC and you will see their immense lobbying effort so as to protect the BILLIONS of YOUR TAX dollars they receive each and every year from a nation that is broke.  Where does the money come from? BORROWED so your childrens, children will be paying far into the future!  

For Christ sakes people try to think logically for just one second.  How can there be so many people out there that are pedophilles?  People are full of fear. Inquiring of CP’s nature alone one is so full of fear its not done by family, or friends, and legal research is left up to the individual, alone.  According to, Lawrence G. Walters, Esq. Family Values groups and other opponents of free speech routinely use the terms “pornography, obscenity and child pornography,” together. This is an attempt to cause confusion in the mind of the public who intentionally link perfectly legal content with evidence of a horrific crime and the media through ignorance or complicity often complicated matters by playing along.  Why is this a problem? Because pedophilia is actually a somewhat rare condition (despite what media reports may imply), hebephilia is common because it’s part of our normal human development process.  Why do we find these young teens to be even remotely sexy in the first place, because hebephilia, ephebophilia, and beyond comes naturally to humans, we can mate with them and produce children, and that’s how the architecture of sexual reproduction works.  

Few and far between are lawyers who will demand full disclosure from prosecution, get the charges dropped, or at least in line with the supposed offense.  If the lawyer is unsupported, pessimistic, or displays a lack of enthusiasm, this may seal the fate of the accused, removing any doubts about SUICIDE being the only remaining option. Unfortunately an option that many take when faced with the overwhelming knowledge they themselves will go to jail. As a matter of fact I feel sorry for the poor public defender that is faced with a crime of the magnitude; especially if they have a agglomeration of those cases. If one is able to afford an attorney the better off they are. However Attorneys are not cheap and the whole affair could cost upward of 100,000 dollars. Faced with the fact you have no Constitutional right it is a no brainier for many and for others death. Imagine a picture or a video causing a death. Something like in “Videodrone”

This is something people need to say OUT LOUD! I just allowed a person (commit suicide)die because they looked at a picture or video, because I believed what law enforcement arm of NCMEC told me.   

A picture or video is just that and nothing more no matter what its contents. Yes bad things happen to good people. It is especial egregious if it involves a child, but never the less it is still only a rose by another name, still a rose, still a picture, or still a video; nothing more no matter what the content!  Say it again; LOUDER! I just allowed a person (commit suicide) die because they looked at a picture or video. Saying it out loud gives it depth and weight.  When you read about someone who commits suicide after a pre dawn raid of their private domain. Put yourself in their place. Walk in their shoes for just one stinking minute. This person has done NO wrong, has hurt NO person, NO place, or NO thing. Now rather than face the ridicule of CP they go hang or shoot themselves. Stand up and shout!! I just allowed a person  to KILL Themselves because they looked at a PICTURE or VIDEO. YELL at The Top of your  Lungs!! GOD forgive me I just allowed a person to KILL THEMSELVES because they lOOked at a PICture or VIDeo.  I believed what law enforcement told me but now I KNOW that it is based on voo-doo science.  

All involved with law enforcement; judge lest ye be judged. Stand with your right hand over your chest or hands clasp together in prayer and say OUT LOUD!  I just allowed a person to die in jail or not because they looked at a picture or video!   I believed  the voo-doo science of the child abuse industry law enforcement arm namely NCMEC. I trusted them and they LIED! Once a person makes up their mind they will kill themselves regardless of any preventive measures taken.  The more barriers you place in front of them the longer it takes and  just prolongs the agony. I do not need to see electricity to know when I flick the light switch a light comes on. I do not see it but I know it is there.

Know this your TAX DOLLARS are going to support the lavish life style of NCMEC and the child abuse industry and not millions BILLIONS.  I have another interaction I would like to help you with. Go to Google and type, “people found dead after child porn charges”. What you will find is page upon page of these Suicides but no specific number. That is why they try  keep a person in jail; separated divided,  conquered. Think about it what would you do if faced with 20yrs. which is typical? A Justice Department study conducted by David Finkelhor of the University of New Hampshire shows that the attorney general’s tally of 440,000 missing includes children missing for a “few minutes to overnight.”According to an analysis of the Justice Department figures by the Statistical Assessment Service, an independent organization that examines research findings, 19 percent of the “lost” children misunderstood parental instructions; another 12 percent forgot the time. In all, 73 percent of those lost were home within 24 hours. Among runaways, STATS reports, half returned home within two days, and 73 percent of parents were aware of their child’s location. 

  1. Let me stop here for one minute.  What have I, in the person of the writer learned so far?

1) If arrested for CP you loose your constitutional guarantees or protection.

2)If you are arrested for CP you lose all that is important in life, family friends. You push people away in fear they may get caught up in the madness. 

3) a person is likely to commit suicide in jail or not.

4) sexual abuse in children happens but usually at the hands of those close to them.

3) Sexual abuse with children happens mainly within the family. It is called INCEST not Pedophilia.(they use pedophilia or pedophile because INCEST does not sell)

4) NCMEC and their cohorts have the game rigged to support their massive budget and life styles. The taxpayers have paid NCMEC Billions of dollars. They in turn formulate the lie to keep the billions Coming. They have to pay the bills don’t they?.  

5) The child abuse industry pays very very well! 

6) Not everybody should go to college because an education in the wrong hands is very dangerous.  

7) I have been lied to by some of my governments agency’s.  Our governments’, use it or lose it budget policies created this monster that has to be quelled by the voters.  The government through the legislature needs to fix this. I do not mind living by the law of the land as long as its reciprocal.  

8) I am not going to kill myself. I am going to FIGHT!

Be it Fear,  superstitious, or fixed ideas all have left many in everlasting ignorance, of witch(get it) they died.  A voice crying from this insane abyss needs to be heard over the rhetoric.  After being arrested one can develop the nothing to lose attitude.

For young fathers with children lives tragically altered devastated never to recover what is real sad it is devastating through ignorance. If the spouse sticks in there they live a life of constant suspicion. There are a couple of  things that can keep a person from going to the dark place under these circumstances. Morals and empathy the same morals and empathy I instilled upon my daughter by doing the right thing. I taught her like I was taught to have them even when someone is trying to hurt you. One can only trust God by keeping a clean house. If a dude has a problem they need to get it taken care of. Dude miss sir Mr. hombres mohairs your child is not a play toy.  If only turning the cheek were so simple when it comes to CP.

Sex abuse and CP cases are very popular with the police. Old men pose little or no danger for them. They are often helpless; some hooked up to oxygen like myself, frail, cause no resistance.  They are even arresting their own in the feeding frenzy. Once arrested and knowing how grave the situation is the legal fees, bail or bond, each can be in the tens of thousands before you even get to first base.   What’s left? Many commit suicide. In the current environment, the chances of prosecution are high, and the police gain popularity from the ‘moral indignation’ of society against child sex abusers put forth by the child abuse industry and no one questions them on anything. NOTHING, people just gasp in horror instead of trying to find out exactly what they are talking about.  NOBODY challenges them NOT ONE, not even seasoned reporters.

The governments prosecutors federal and state are the one’s calling the shots they frame and carry their message without any question.  So what do seasoned reporters do? They go after the person arrested knowing full well their legal rep. told them to be silent and so they draw conclusions by what the prosecutors tell them. Prosecutors are not legally bound to tell you the truth.   Isn’t our media coverage great here in the Greatest bla bla bla with no oversight in which prosecuting zealots make victims out of kids sexing and  thereby ruin their lives as will. There are already real sick shit out there for you to prosecute you need not buttering your bread of the back of others.  They have become the architects of oppression. They need victims so they coerce almost adult young woman to be victims saying if they do not they will prosecute them for CP. These young women are now victims because you have to have a victim.  Then they frame the argument and publish it with a media event. Look what were doing with your tax dollars; protecting your children.  Does the reader know how many tax dollars they are speaking off? Why do they do that? It is the LAW; they have to by LAW! So it is through the LAW change must come. A person needs to change the hearts and minds of his fellow travelers on this road to happy destiny  no matter how steep the travale. 

Prosecutors also get the positive reinforcement from the media exposure and another chance to  brainwash, especially when well known people are involved. The new bastions of “child abuse industry protectors” and their prosecutors are using the law to social engineer their morality on others.   Knowing full well 95% to  98% of children abused are abused in their own homes; those percentages  have an ACTUAL valid number associated with a actual human being. Those statistics state categorically that, ” few abuses are at the hands of strangers” and if that is the case what the hell is going on here?  Careful statistical analysis show that many problems which the original researchers had uncritically assumed to be caused by sexual abuse could more plausibly be attributed to generally inadequate family environments, with which they were much more strongly correlated. The harm supposedly caused to children from being photographed naked or taking part in sexual activity with their peers or with adults has been greatly exaggerated. There is no more intrinsic reason why any harm at all should result from such activities than from children going with their parents on a naturist holiday. Not that there is no need to for genuine concern. We are right to worry over the possibility that children will be exploited against their will, that rape or sadistic attacks will be perpetrated on camera; However the production of such pictures is vanishingly rare, and there is no shortage of criminal law to deal with any perpetrators who are caught. Even in such cases, though, we would be hard put to blame the private viewer of such material for creating a market in it. There is no means, not even on the Internet, to buy and sell such material. Illegal images may be posted, but this will invariably be done anonymously or with a phony “from” address for obvious reasons. This means that it is impossible to make money on these activities. From time to time someone may naively hope do so, lured by claims in the media that it is a profitable business. These commercial attempts have always been stopped very quickly: If the potential customers can find the producer then so can the police. The notion that there is a vast child porn industry, organized by some ruthless mafia, is simply a myth. Throughout the Western world, and increasingly beyond, we find barriers being set up between adults and children. In the name of protecting innocence we are enforcing emotional and physical separation of age classes in a sort of generational apartheid that sees fathers afraid to hug their children too affectionately and teachers’ unions advising teachers to keep a minimum gap of three feet between themselves and their pupils. The barriers invisible but strong, enforced by a climate of fear; people are becoming terrified of being identified as a pedophile.

The child abuse industry say they are out to build a better world but they have destroyed more families here in America than all the wars, plagues, and pestilences that America has experienced throughout its entire history. Child Protective Services routinely violates the Constitutional rights of parents and their children in the process of their “intervention”. The sex abuse moral panic has been replaced by that of CP, the police have new and even safer corruption possibilities, in which the third party  ‘the abused victim’  is not physically involved. Instead digitized representation is made in the form of 0’s and 1’s then resembled from a far.  Kids being kids with some adults capturing it share with out shame or monetary compensation that is until 7dollars produced shame. It has become an affront to humanity when finding CP on a computer, or causing it to be there during a  sting.  The police are in an ideal situation to justify their budgets because of the, “use it or lose it ” accounting has cause government to grow exponentially. There are sections of a police forces who use CP and employ CP in stings to catch downloaders. They also surf and troll web sites dealing in adult pornography for possible underage erotic or pornographic images, borderline images, or for links to illegal sites. Consider the possible affects of the power given to insensitive police to censor the sexual morality of citizens. We saw what happened with male and female prison officers in Iraq and now they have been empowered to police sexual morality( Soldiers raping and killing. ( Now they come home to police the streets of the good old USA.

The one that cry’s the loudest has the biggest problem!

In my 64 yr. It has been my experience the ones that scream the loudest are the ones that have CP on their own computers and how do I know this.  The police are arresting the police for CP for Christs sake.(  If I was able to hook up EnCase law enforcement software right now to every law enforcement agent including those involved with the child abuse industry as well as the person reading this what do you think the outcome would be?  I will tell you that in the public private partnership in these US more than half would have some sort of CP on their personal computers and or Phones. I would be bet my life on that and I do not even need a survey; Just their computers. If all the children are victims how can it be that roughly 13,000 juveniles are tried in adult courts every year, where the child is not considered a victim.  In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court in Roper v. Simmons declared death by execution is unconstitutional for juveniles but before the ruling, 365 children were legally executed in the United States. That Ivory tower of hypocrisy will change because I pray the people will change it. 

Progressively orchestrated more and more people are being served search warrants for CP, neighbors, friends, loved ones and people are beginning to realize that they can be next one in line. Do not worry though when your turn comes they have plenty of room for you.  I know your saying it will never happen to me by now but it will and they will with much success turn the family against you. Not to worry though you will be placed in the loving arms of the private prison industrial complex.  Corrections Corporation of America has a capacity of more than 80,000 beds in 65 correctional facilities. The GEO Group operates 57 facilities with a capacity of 49,000 beds  The company owns or runs more than 100 properties that operate more than 73,000 beds in sites across the world.  Sooner or latter people wondering if they are next will begin shout, “enough, is enough” with monitoring. We are already a police state where we are being monitored 24 X 7 via computer, phone ,internet traffic cams, web cams, and drones.   Unfortunately the masses need to be sick and tired of being sick and tired before things change. It has to change in a civilized way through the courts themselves. Hopefully and by the Grace of God people will begin to wake up from the child abuse industries brainwashing that has been going on for decades. They have become very powerful and even more so because they are and arm of the law through through the public private partnership. All those Iraqi and Afghanistan intelligence soldiers have come home joined police departments. That is the only way government seems to be able to stimulate the economy being held back from doing massive infrastructure projects so millions are being pumped into law enforcement.  Not to deal with the Wall ST. rip off CEO’s or the massive gang problem but by sitting behind a computer screen looking for people that inadvertently or not download CP. Then they making those individuals look real bad with press conferences. 

Classified files  provided previously by NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden contain new details about ground breaking surveillance technology. The agency has developed it to infect millions of computers worldwide with malware “implants.”.  The clandestine initiative enables the NSA to break into targeted computers. Imagine! What in the hell happened to the terrorists; where did they go? Now the citizens are the terrorists whoopee we’re all gonna die! One, two, three what are we fighting for don’t ask me cause I don’t give a damn. 

Courts will begin, at a point in time, to realize the hyprocracy that although justice is blind it still wields a mighty cane.  The power of the court is in relatives term omniscient they possess the power to take away life and liberty; with CP it is life in relative terms.  I believe the courts wisdom will prevail and they will find out what is really going on and investigate. I sure pray so. To put a responsible productive member of society behind bars, deny them life and liberty for having nothing but 1984 Orwellian Thought-crime. A crime in which there is no real statistical evidence that one is being harmed by the person having that Thought crime. Justices will eventually see the apples and oranges of the whole issue. I believe in our Nation’s legal system and that is why I’m writing this report, a report written in adversity under what I perceive to be tyranny. 

Many years ago our freedom of expression was defended on the premise that a free exchange of ideas was necessary in order to discover the truth about a number of issues. Now it is being defended by the NSA and other secretive government institutions on the premise that we are incapable of knowing the truth because we are unable to know the truth about much if anything.   There has been a shift from seeing freedom of expression as fulfilling a particular purpose;  to seeing it as an end in itself. The rationale for this freedom has changed not to moral relativism in which nobody is right or wrong and we tolerate the behavior of others even when we disagree about their morality to righteous indignation. 

Righteous indignation is a reactive emotion of anger over perceived mistreatment; in this case  mistreatment of a child. The child abuse industry through brainwashing has feed this ugly concept to the American people over time using a large spoon on the premise their principles can be validated by reason. However  when one brings that concept out into the light of day one finds it far from the truth.  The broad brush of idioms in which they paint their canvas is atrocious and ruins lives.  In some Christian doctrines righteous indignation is considered the only form of anger which is not sinful. They have a long track record of squashing political views and burning people at the stake when that person’s  cultural material offends them.  Denying someone their freedom of expression goes hand in hand with violations of other rights defended on the ground with no definitive standard by which we may judge what is true. The child abuse industry does not have any standard by which we can distinguish reason in pursuit of truth. Instead I believe their passion is derived from the pursuit of greed in quest of gain and that gives them pleasure as they all go laughingly to the bank with tax payer dollars. Since the child abuse industry has no standard that can justify supporting freedom of expression they instead support the suppression of expression saying obscenity does not have any public value and no First Amendment rights. On that basis there is no philosophic barrier to censoring it; thus it is not inconsistent for the law to guarantee freedom of speech freedom of press while at the same time suppressing both.  

The Child Abuse industry lobbied the Child On-line Protection Act (COPA) with sweeping  laws that censor the Internet and they have broad support among conservative Christian Fundamentalist  and family oriented groups. Free speech advocates allege that, the government has no right to censor speech on the Internet or it cannot reduce adults to hearing and seeing only speech that the  government considers suitable for children.  Recent attempts to protect copyright infringement such as the Stop Online Privacy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) led to massive on-line protests which helped kill both bills.  Issues of on-line piracy and obscenity by community standards will be used to drive the battles over freedom of speech will continue the USA.  Regardless of the current climate in Washington DC, Americans must be able to express their opinion and access information from a free press because these freedoms are essential to liberty and the democratic form of government.  While it may seem that changes in culture and technology have made certain U.S. Supreme Court interpretations and precedents irrelevant our First Amendment rights are just as important today as when they were first passed in 1791. One need to remember that our government is only as good as the liberty it allows us. When we express ourselves we are able to have the necessary input into the political process. Whether through a free press,  in writing, or through digital media where videos of how people interact no matter the age is available. Why because it is news; even if that news goes against our grain we need to do research and get information on our government as well as its officials.  Americans today continue to need the freedoms, of speech, and press, including what some perceive to be obscene. Especially in the light that those obscenity laws were created using faulty and misleading information from the child abuse industry lobby NCMEC. 

For those who are incensed at the idea that children these days are becoming “sexualised” as a result of pernicious modern exposure to sex on TV, movies and so forth should read the diary of Anne Frank in the unexpurgated edition that has been available in recent years. One wonders even whether these days the brave girl revered around the world as an icon of fortitude in the face of Nazi oppression, would be branded a sexual delinquent in the light of passages like this one, in which she refers to a school friend, when the two girls would have been about 12 years old; “…Sometimes when I lie in bed at night I feel a terrible urge to touch my breasts and listen to the quiet, steady beating of my heart. Unconsciously, I had these feelings even before I came here. Once when I was spending the night at Jacque’s, I could no longer restrain my curiosity about her body, which she’d always hidden from me and which I’d never seen. I asked her whether, as proof of our friendship, we could touch each other’s breasts. Jacque refused. I also had a terrible desire to kiss her, which I did. Every time I see a female nude, such as the Venus in my art history book, I go into ecstasy. Sometimes I find them so exquisite I have to struggle to hold back my tears. If only I had a girlfriend!”

We all know what happened to Anne Frank. The BANG BANG BANG BANG on the door by law enforcement these days is just as horrific now as it was then.

Between 2001 and 2013, the FBI Violent Crimes Against Children program has recorded the following statistics which they call accomplishments.  The FBI boasts their approximate number of informations and indictments are more than 16,152. Their approximate number of arrests are more than 23,953 with an approximate number of convictions being more than 16,962. Let put this in the light of day and  take a look at those figures. They had 16,152 indictments out of 23,953 arrests meaning 7,801 people lives were destroyed unnecessary. The FBI do not come right out and say it because as with the rest of government they figure your to lazy to check and do not directly mention that in their accomplishments. They do mention that they have more than 16,962 convictions which means 810 people were convicted without indictment? The law enforcement arm of federal government state they exactly know so they have to estimate adding to the voo-doo.  

 All our CP laws are based on voo-doo science. In science and statistics either there is an exact number or there is not.  The FBI does not know how many they have arrested and instead provide approximates just like their voo-doo counter parts in the private public law enforcement arm of NCMEC.

Our current law CP laws are based on how people previously viewed CP; pre internet.  CP use to be in a magazine or film that a person is able to see, feel, touch and hold in their hands. Those laws do not address the current wave of CP prosecutions where miraculously thousands are  rounded up prosecuted as pedophiles and throw in jail. Law enforcement is able to do this with impunity through the ignorance of the population. They have people so frightened they do not ask questions for fear of being consumed by its insanity. Reporters themselves do not report, or investigate; as to why all of a sudden we have thousands of pedophiles in jail every year for the past two decades as if someone waved a magic wand and they just appeared.  These laws based on voo doo science reflect the current reality of CP and how it is looked at today by surfing the web.  Federal law stipulates that CP is against the law for everyone. Police have to break the law to catch someone with CP because they themselves have to search it out, download it,  look at it using the same techniques’ law breakers use.  Think about this; the  police robing a bank to find a bank robber or the police do drugs to catch drug users both good analogies. If the police state they were only looking for hash-tags of CP and not the actual CP it is important to know hash tags can be sent without there corresponding image. 

I would like the reader to think logically please; I do not want you to believe a word I write. I do want you to find out for yourself by reading all you can about this hostile dilemma. Between the years 1996 to 2005 that being 8ys. there was as a 2,026% or Two Thousand and Twenty Six percent increase in cases opened by the FBI.  In which no reporters showed up no news cameras, no anything. If it were anything else they would be DEMANDING answers; However the news people have done nothing which has allowed for this cowboy like atmosphere. The news would normally go after anything that had a 2,026% increase in it, but not so with CP. On that very same page the FBI says there were 15,556 cases opened between that same time period in which there is even a larger difference of 13,154 people.   The governments’ philosophy seems to be if we can’t dazzle you with brilliance we will baffle you with bull-shit, and it is working.  If we were to acknowledge the FBI’s  report of 15,556 cases opened in that same time period that would make it a 17,578% increase and  not just a 2,026% increase in cases opened. Where are the reporters? Who is going to report this? Out of the 15,556 cases opened by the FBI only 4,784 were indicted leaving 10,772 lives destroyed along with their families. Still no reporter reporting!  The FBI also reports a 856% increase in indictments being 99 people to 946 people. That means they choose to destroy 1,456 peoples lives because they choose not use surveillance to see if actual harm was coming to children. Lives needlessly destroyed by  government agency’s, caught up in their use it or lose it budget mentality. Our trusted government  has turned against us needlessly and there is no one out there to stop them. 

Because your tax dollars are better spent when they are spread around in 2004 the FBI launched along with a myriad of other law enforcement personal Operation Peer Pressure. They conducted 166 undercover on-line sessions using P2P networks in which FBI Agents download child pornography from offender’s computers. The FBI states that operation netted over 300 search warrants to be

executed; out of those 300 warrants 69 subjects were indicted and 63 subjects were arrested, and over 40 convictions were achieved. Let us break that down.  Out of the 166 on line searches 300 search warrants were issued there by destroying 300 lives including the lives of the people in those homes searched. Out of those 300 only 69 were indicted and 231 were not, but the newspapers only reported their arrests and destroying their lives as well. Only 63 were arrested out of the 300 and 40 convictions achieved. So the FBI believes it is OK to destroy 260 peoples lives to convict 40 people for doing nothing more than look at pictures. In 2003 the FBI began started a nationwide initiative to investigate child sexual abuse in eGroups that are typically by invite only. There were 180 search warrants issued of which 162 people were indicted thus leaving 18 lives needlessly destroyed. Of those 162 indicted only 89 people were arrested meaning the grand jury did not find enough evidence to indite 73 people but the prosecutor only arrested 89 people and here is where it gets interesting. Confused yet? You bet yea! This is just the way they like it because they figure your to stupid to check for yourself. The FBI states there were over 100 convictions in that operation yet there were only 89 arrests. How do they do it? Voo-doo science and miss informing the misinformed. 

The National Child Victim Identification System (NCVIS) is owned by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI). It is an application that assists federal, state, local, and international law enforcement agencies, INTERPOL, and other supporting organizations. NCMEC is authorized to partner with NCVIS in the investigation and prosecution of child exploitation crimes, specifically those involving images of child sexual exploitation. NCVIS maintains a repository of digital images of child exploitation seized and/or submitted to ICE and other federal agencies for comparison. Images may capture the faces or other identifying features of the victims and violators involved in these crimes. Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) expanded the scope of that system of information. Now it is shared with other authorized partners that maintain their own databases of images related to child exploitation crimes for the purposes of identifying the children. This expanded sharing was intended to allow law enforcement personnel to use the images during investigations to identify and rescue children and identify and prosecute perpetrators. 

The Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for NCVIS was originally published on August 21, 2009. Because HSI is expanding the scope of NCVIS information that is shared with authorized partners, an update to the NCVIS PIA was required.  Other systems include; DHS/NPPD/PIA-021 a Joint Cybersecurity Services Program Defense Industrial Base (DIB) and Enhanced Cybersecurity Services (DECS). Component: National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD).  Approved  July 18, 2012. The Joint Cybersecurity Services Pilot (JCSP) is the Department’s voluntary information sharing initiative with the Department of Defense (DOD) and participating commercial companies. NPPD is updating the DHS/NPPD/PIA-021 National Cyber Security Division Joint Cybersecurity Services Pilot PIA that was published on January 13, 2012, to reflect the establishment of Joint Cybersecurity Services Program (JCSP) as an ongoing permanent program. The purpose of the program is to enhance the cybersecurity of participating critical infrastructure entities through information sharing partnerships with the critical infrastructure organization or their Commercial Service Provider (CSP). 

I know it is very hard to understand but it is that way for a reason. Its intentionally made that way because of all the child porn found on government computers. So now NCVIS is owned by ICE’s HSI. HSI is expanding the scope of system information that is shared with authorized partners that maintain their own databases of images related to child exploitation crimes for the purposes of identifying the child victims. Supporting law enforcement investigations and prosecutions of these crimes is Joint Cybersecurity Services(JCS), Program Defense Industrial Base (DIB), and Enhanced Cybersecurity Services (DECS), Joint Cybersecurity Services Pilot(JCSP), and they all each and everyone have child pornographic data bases.  

The Voo Doo Science of  re-victimization.  Pseudoscience goes to great pains to resemble genuine sciences. On the surface they endeavor to look good being without reproach but on closer examination of their contents, methods, and attitudes reveal them to be mere parodies.   Analysis of the perspectives and practices of these scientific poseurs is likely to expose a mystical worldview that has merely been restated in scientific sounding jargon.  The pseudosciences are characterized by non-reproducible findings that are allegedly mediated by forces unmeasurable by conventional scientific methods. Kids, even adult kids generally tend to tell you what you want to hear; especially if you an adult kid in prison or an adult kid with an attorney as a victim. Pseudo scientists rarely participate in the learned societies devoted to subject matters of mutual interest but derive their pseudo scientific research from smaller populations like the Aborigines of Australia and native Indian tribes in the USA and Canada.   

Do you remember being told by a grown up that if something sounds to good to be true it probably is? Well that same concept, “if it is to good to be true” is tied to the unlikeliness of the hypothesis they test. Surprisingly the results may be awash in a pervasive bias favoring the publication claiming to have found something new. In a nutshell consider 1,000 hypotheses being tested of which just 100 are true where law enforcement including judges depend on your studies to do their job.  The following video is some of what CP law is based on and 18 minutes into the video you will find out exactly how some of these images flooded the INTERNET.(  Another piece  terminology law enforcement thrives on is, “ rescued”.  In fact any child that is arrested is rescued, if a runaway comes home they are rescued,  because a child is always the victim. Those children will in fact will bolt from who ever has them the first chance they get.  Here is the hypocrisy of it all. Roughly 13,000 juveniles are tried in adult courts every year, were the child is not considered a victim.  In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court in Roper v. Simmons declared death by execution is unconstitutional for juveniles but before the ruling, 365 children were legally executed in the United States.  Either a child is a victim or is not a victim. The child abuse industry frames the argument that all children are victims. If that is the case why is there 13,000 children a year considered non victims and what is the child abuse industry doing for them? NOTHING! Why isn’t the government doing anything about those child victims? Think about it what is the best way to go after guns? Any light go off in your brain yet, while you, without question, “because of the children”, “think about the children” argument.  You freely give up your constitutional rights because of “the children” because some ass diddles their child.    

The child abuse industry controls the argument and if you object to their argument you’re in denial. Thay have you coming and going; it has become the perfect growth industry, a  THREE BILLION dollar a year industry; for just NCMEC alone. (

The United States is a respected democracy that over the years has permitted the use of torture for a good cause and for the protection of the society. A prison society is growing quickly and is operated by the private sector in which approximately 2% of the population is serving some sort of sentence, most of them in a prison.  Private prison operators are even traded on the stock market and they are known to be very profitable and sustainable as more and more prisons are built and more and more people are put into prison which has increased 4% each year and “Producing” convicted criminals HAS BECOME A HIGHLY PROFITABLE INDUSTRY and more and more criminals have to be produced so that the money keeps coming. There are credible rumors of bribes from operators of the prison to the judges and prosecutors they pay premiums for their so called new convictions that result in a prison stay. So you don’t have to be so picky in any investigation, let alone employ qualified officers and in this way there is always a sufficient supply of people to put in prison plus YOU HAVE TO CRIMINALIZE A LOT OF THINGS. At this point, the reader should pause and do a little reflection on their part, and let this go once more through their brain about this beautiful, great democracy.

In the “kids for cash” scandal of 2008 judicial kickbacks at the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania two judges, President Judge Mark Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael Conahan, were accused of accepting money from Robert Mericle a builder of two private for-profit juvenile facilities and in return for contracting with the facilities and imposing harsh sentences on juveniles brought before their courts to increase the number of inmates in the detention centers.

Judge Ciavarella sentenced children to extended stays in juvenile detention for offenses as minimal as mocking a principal on Myspace or trespassing in a vacant building, and shoplifting from Wal-mart. Judges Ciavarella and Conahan pled guilty on February 13, 2009, pursuant to a plea agreement, to federal charges of honest services fraud and conspiracy to defraud the United States by failing to report their income to the IRS known as tax evasion; also in connection with receiving $2.6 million in payments from managers at the PA Child Care in Pittston Township and its sister company Western PA Child Care in Butler County. After the original plea agreement, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered an investigation of the cases handled by the judges and following its outcome overturned several hundred convictions of youths in Luzerne County. Their plea agreement was voided by a federal judge dissatisfied with the post plea conduct of both judges and the Judges charged subsequently withdrew their guilty pleas, raising the possibility of a criminal trial. After the original plea agreement, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered an investigation of the cases handled by the judges and following its outcome overturned several hundred convictions of youths in Luzerne County. The Juvenile Law Center filed a class action lawsuit against the judges and numerous other parties, and the state legislature created a commission to investigate the wide-ranging juvenile justice problems in the county. 

The FBI and the IRS also investigated the two judges while probing practices in Luzerne County., although the exact dates and scope of the investigations by the two federal agencies were not made public.  In part the investigation was revealed to have occurred during disciplinary hearings over the conduct of another former Luzerne County judge, Anne H. Lokuta.  Lokuta was brought before the Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania in November 2006 to answer charges of using court workers to do her personal bidding, openly displaying bias against some attorneys arguing before her, and publicly berating staff to cause mental distress.[20] The board ruled against Lokuta in November 2008 and she was removed from the bench. During the course of the disciplinary hearings, Lokuta accused then Judge Michael Conahan of bullying behavior and charged that he was behind a conspiracy to have her removed. Lokuta aided the federal investigation into the “kids for cash” scheme prior to the determination of the disciplinary board, and a stay order was issued in March 2009 by the state Supreme Court in light of the ongoing corruption investigations, halting Lokuta’s removal and the election that was to be held in May to replace her.

A class action lawsuit was also filed by the Juvenile Law Center on behalf of the juveniles who were adjudicated delinquent by Ciavarella despite not being represented by counsel or advised of their rights. The suit seeks damages under the civil portion of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act or RICO act against the judges’ spouses and business associates, shell companies, prison operators, and Luzerne County. Three other federal lawsuits filed on behalf of the victims have been consolidated with the Juvenile Law Center lawsuit into a master class action and a amended master complaint was filed on August 28, 2009.  Who do you think will pay when a judgement is rendered?  YOU THE TAX PAYER!! 

The overwhelming flow of child pornography appeals into the docket of the U.S. Is also a little know reality in the military’s highest appellate court.  67% of the docket in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces consists of child pornography appeals. The dominant demographic for both military personnel as well as CP consumers is 18 to 45 years of age.  The big difference is civilians must consider lawyer fees whereas there is no financial barrier to appeal for military members because they are represented by judge advocates.  However the most compellingly point is there are many questions that are still unsettled by federal and state legislators and the court regarding what should be criminalized surrounding the search and seizure of computer or internet material which contributes to the likelihood that there is grounds to bring appeal.

The majority of CP defendants 99.9% are not actually photographing these children; that’s another story as well as another charge. I’m also not talking about the folks that are featured on NBC’s To Catch a Predator that too is an entirely different charge. What I’m writing about is CP that doesn’t necessarily involve children that are currently alive and well. Pictures and videos that are forty and fifty years old; these children victims may have long since passed into the afterlife, yet their images continue to send scores of citizens to prison every day. According to law enforcement Being “curious” about CP means;

a) You are a sociopath.

b) You are an accomplice to the terrible suffering and violent deaths of innocent children.

c)You need help.

CP Voo-doo logic; You stick a needle into a Voo-doo doll’s arm. The person you curse will be hurt on the arm. The voo-doo doll symbolizes a person, and that person’s will get injured in the same place where you stuck the needle. This bring us to CP Voo-doo logic; Someone possesses a thought they place that thought onto their personal computer in the form of 0′s and 1′s in a computer file, and when that person looks at that file, the individual depicted in the file gets victimized and hurt. Imagine that same Voo-doo logic applied to murder and terrorism.   Were are talking about teenagers not babies. It’s a logical fallacy; sounds good but it isn’t and saying so doesn’t make it so.  If you were to apply the same reasoning to any other crime scene photo or video , then looking at a photo of any crime would be re-victimizing someone living or dead. Using the same reasoning, anyone who looks for, views images or video footage of 9/11 or Nazi war crimes, or autopsy photos, etc, would be guilty of having re-victimized people. If the simple act of viewing an image of someone is harmful, then perhaps an appropriate punishment would be to simply take a photo of the perpetrator in jail. Then set them free, but have some look at the photo that was taken while they were in jail it is the same premise 

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children(NCMEC) through the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children Inc.(ICMEC) is advancing on a global scale and by conducting strong secret lobbying activities it has become a major influence on virtually all European governments, including the EU, and in particular the UK. This U.S. based organization has also become very important by their strong aggressive political agenda in Europe. NCMEC also works frequently with foreign government entities, including the formally designated Central Authorities of Hague Convention Contracting States, on cases of international family abduction.  Many  interesting articles on the topic are at your fingertips which you search for NCMEC on Google. (check it out; prove me wrong) After conduction a search you will soon notice the immense power this U.S. organization in other nations. I for one have come to realize that people should not be afraid of terrorists but of the child protection lobby which is much more ominous, insidious, and is directly linked to the interests of Christian religious fundamentalists. NCMEC is, moreover, also intertwined with the American broadcaster NBC which has broadcast the series “To Catch a Predator” which was a primetime show where alleged child abusers were caught in a sting in front of the camera. In the show the police officers impersonate children and suggest meetings with the adults who were tackled to the ground and arrested after leaving the camera sting house.  While NCMEC broadcasts there brain washing via news media as well as the internet so a person can not go one day without hearing about child abuse.  Type, ” child abuse” in any search engine and you will see the immense power they wield.  ICMEC broadcast their American political and social interests abroad without a stated goal to remove children from their established residences in other countries so that they might be raised in the United States, where all contact with their foreign relations would be impossible.  This is derived from the conceited notion that the United States alone knows what is best for the children.  There is a web site devoted to, “We Are Not Missing” here.  . 

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me. Who will speak for you 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s